Supreme Court of India
KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION ETC. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA on 11 January 1996
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
'
KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION ETC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA
JANUARY 11, 1996
B
[KULDIP SINGH AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.)
Income-tax Act, 1961 :
Bad debts-Observation regarding refund of tax made in the main judgment at paras 9 to I 5 deleted-On the advances being written off steps c ' could be taken by the assessee in accordance with the relevant provisions relating to bad debts. State Bank of Travancore v. Commissioner of Income Tax, [1986) 2 SCC 11=158 ITR 102, referred to and· explained.
D
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : I.A. Nos. I to 6.
IN
Civil Appeal Nos. 4636 to 4641 of 1994.
E From the Judgment and Order dated 24.10.84 of the Kerala High Court in l.T.R. C. Nos. 279 and 280 of 1979. J. Ramamurthy, B.B. Ahuja, R. Satish and B.K. Prasad for the Appel-lants. F P.S. Poti and N. Sudhakaran for the Respondent. The Order of the Court was delivered by F
HANSARIA, J.
366 SCPREME COURT REPORTS [I996] I S.C.R.
A
A stand has been taken because what the majority had held in the aforesaid case was that in cases of 'sticky advances' what could really be done is that on the assessee writing off the advances, the same would become bad debt and could be so dealt by the assessee as permitted by the relevant section of the Income Tax Act. In aforesaid paras, however, it came to be stated that on the advances B become bad debts, refund of tax paid on the interest could be claimed by the assessee in accordance with law. It is apparent that the majority in State Bank of Travancore had not said so. This is not disputed by Shri Poli who had appeared for the appellants.
It is accordingly stated that the observation made relating to refund of C tax in the aforesaid paragraphs of the judgment would stand deleted. Instead, we state on the advances being written off, steps could be taken by the assessee in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act reiatable to bad debts.
The applications are disposed of with these observations.
D
G.N.
Applications are disposed of.
'·