FIRST APPEAL 9 of 2008 on 6 November 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI.

F.A. No. 163 of 2011withF.A. No. 164 of 2011withF.A. No. 165 of 2011withF.A. No. 166 of 2011withF.A. No. 167 of 2011withF.A. No. 168 of 2011withF.A. No. 169 of 2011with F.A. No. 170 of 2011withF.A. No. 171 of 2011

…

Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh

…Appellant [In all the cases].

-V e r s u s-Sobran Mahto @ Yadav & Another …Respondents [In F.A.No. 163 of 2011]Degan Sah …Respondent [In F.A.No. 164 of 2011]Chamari Mahto …Respondent [In F.A.No. 165 of 2011]Bhawani Yadav & Others …Respondents [In F.A.No. 166 of 2011]Bhikhi Yadav & Others …Respondents [In F.A.No. 167 of 2011]Most. Tahli …Respondent [In F.A.No. 168 of 2011]Ram Sahay Mahto & Others …Respondents [In F.A.No. 169 of 2011]Hanif Miyan …Respondent [In F.A.No. 170 of 2011]Heman Mahto …Respondent [In F.A.No. 171 of 2011]

...

CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT.

…

For the Appellant : - J.C. to S.C (Mines).For the Respondent: - M/s. R. Chaubey, K.L. Ray and C.K. Singh, Advocates …

06/06.12.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the Respondents.

Perused the papers.

The present First appeals are preferred, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 06.11.2009 passed in L. R. Case No. 9 of 2008 arising out of Land Acquisition Case No. 7 of 2006-07 by the Court of Sub-Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Land Acquisition, Hazaribagh.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, the issue/point involved in these matters requires consideration. Hence, these appeals, being first appeals are admitted for hearing.

Call for the lower court records.

Since the respondents have already appeared, no notice need be issued.

...

I.A. No. 1242 of 2012 in F.A. No. 163 of 2011, I.A. No. 1241 of 2012 in F.A. No. 164 of 2011, I.A. No. 1247 of 2012 in F.A. No. 165 of 2011, I.A. No. 1244 of 2012 in F.A. No. 166 of 2011, I.A. No. 1240 of 2012 in F.A. No. 167 of 2011, I.A. No. 1239 of 2012 in F.A. No. 168 of 2011, I.A. No. 1246 of 2012 in F.A. No. 169 of 2011, I.A. No. 1238 of 2012 in F.A. No. 170 of 2011, I.A. No. 1243 of 2012 in F.A. No. 171 of 2011.

...

Heard the learned counsel for the parties on these Interlocutory applications.

Perused these applications.

The present applications are filed under Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, inter alia, praying that further proceedings of Execution Case No.12 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 10 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1242 of 2012 in F.A. No. 163 of 2011),Execution Case No.13 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 11 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1241 of 2012 in F.A. No. 164 of 2011), Execution Case No. 14 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 12 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1247 of 2012 in F.A. No. 165 of 2011), Execution Case No.15 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 13 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1244 of 2012 in F.A. No. 166 of 2011), Execution Case No. 16 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 14 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1240 of 2012 in F.A. No. 167 of 2011, Execution Case No. 17 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 15 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1239 of 2012 in F.A. No. 168 of 2011), Execution Case No. 18 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 16 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1246 of 2012 in F.A. No. 169 of 2011), Execution Case No. 19 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 17 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1238 of 2012 in F.A. No. 170 of 2011), Execution Case No. 20 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 18 of 2008 ( I.A. No. 1243 of 2012 in F.A. No. 171 of 2011) may be stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

Learned counsel for the Respondents wants to file reply to this interlocutory application.

Put up these Interlocutory applications on 13[th] December, 2012.

Arguments

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, by way of ad interim order, till the next date i.e. 13[th] December, 2012, further proceedings of Execution Case No.12 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 10 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1242 of 2012 in F.A. No. 163 of 2011), Execution Case No.13 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 11 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1241 of 2012 in F.A. No. 164 of 2011), Execution Case No. 14 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 12 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1247 of 2012 in F.A. No. 165 of 2011), Execution Case No.15 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 13 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1244 of 2012 in F.A. No. 166 of 2011), Execution Case No. 16 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 14 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1240 of 2012 in F.A. No. 167 of 2011, Execution Case No. 17 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 15 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1239 of 2012 in F.A. No. 168 of 2011), Execution Case No. 18 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 16 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1246 of 2012 in F.A. No. 169 of 2011), Execution Case No. 19 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 17 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1238 of 2012 in F.A. No. 170 of 2011), Execution Case No. 20 of 2010 arising out of L. R. Case No. 18 of 2008 (I.A. No. 1243 of 2012 in F.A. No. 171 of 2011) is stayed.

(P.P. Bhatt, J.)