Supreme Court of India
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, AURANGABAD versus M/S. CEAT LTD., NASIK on 17 February 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
A
COMMISSIONER OF Cl;:NTRAL EXCISE AND 'CUSTOMS, AURANGABAD
v.
MIS. CEA T LTD., NASIK
B
FEBRUARY 17, 2005
[S.N. VARIA VA, DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.]
Central Excise Act, 1944; Section 35L/Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; C Tariff Headings 59.02 and 59.06, Chapter Note-4 to Chapter 59 and Note-4 to Section XI of the Act: Classification-Dipped Tyre Fabric/Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric-levy of excise duty under Tariff Headings 59.02 or 59.06-Held: Jn view of reasons recorded in the connected case viz. Commissioner of Central Excise v. MR.F. Ltd, the appeal is dismissed D
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6971of1999.
From the Judgment and Order dated 5.4.99 of the Central Excise, Customs and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Reginal Bench at Mumbai in A. No. E/167-R/99-Bom in F.O. No. C-11504-505/WZB of 1999.
E
R. Mohan, Additional Solicitor General, Rajiv Dutta, Hemant Shanna, P. Panneswaran and B.Krishna Prasad for the Appeltant.
Ravinder Narain, Sonu Bhatnagar, Ajay Aggarwal and Rajan Narain for the Respondent.
F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPADIA, J. For the reasons given in our decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.R.F. ltd., reported in (2005) I Scale 554, this Civil Appeal filed by the department relating to classification of Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric is dismissed,. with no order as to costs.
G
S.K.S. Appeal dismissed.