Supreme Court of India
RAM PRAKASH SHARMA versus BABULAL IRLA (D) BY LRS. & OTHERS on 12 May 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
3
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(2011) 6 S.C.R. 757
. RAM PRAKASH SHARMA
A
.. • ·. " •.,:·. ,
v.
" , • ~· •• < •
-eABULAL H~LA (0) BY LRS. & OTHERS ' ... "· · I.A. N0.3 OF 2011 _,._ : ; . . IN
... _,._
'CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5310 OF 2010 B
MAY 12, 2011
[MARKANOEY KAT JU ANO GYAN SUOHA MISRA, JJ.]
c
Rent Control and Eviction:
-Eviction matters Time granted to tenant to vacate the -tenanted premises Premises not vacated within the time -granted Held: In such a case, the tenant should be evicted by the policeforce, if he does not vacate the premises on his 0 own ;;.. ::(~1i~nt::cal1li!e an application well in advance to seek . extenslo"tii;>ffi"?:~:·t<)vacate the premises . . .. .. <:·".~.·:~··«· ..
. .. .. .. Cl\/H.;':APPELLATE JURISDICTION : I.A. No. 3 of 2011 ., E
Civil Appeal No. 5310 of 2010.
From the Judgment & Order dated 5.9.2008 of the High Cout of Judicature Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Second Appeal No. 285 of 2005.
F
Madhurima Bora (for Balaji Srinivasan) for the appellant.
Rishi Maheshwari (for Shally Bhasin Maheshwari) for the Respondents.
G
The following Order of the Court was delivered H
... 758 SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2011) 6 S.C.R.
A ORDER
Taken on Board.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
B
In the facts and circumstances of the case, time to vacate the premises in question is extended till 31st August, 2011 and if the tenants do not vacate on or before the said date, they will be evicted by police force.
C We further make it clear that when this Court allows the petition/appeal of the landlord or dismisses the petition/appeal of the tenant and grant some time to vacate the premises in question and if the tenant does not vacate within the time granted, the tenant shall be evicted by police force. This is a general direction we are passing because we are coming D across several cases where the tenants are not vacating the premises in question despite granting time by this Court or despite furnishing an undertaking to this Court with a result that the landlord has to initiate contempt 1roceedings or any other proceedings. Hence, we give a general direction that when E tenant's petition/appeal is dismissed and he is given time to vacate then on the expiry of that time, he will be evicted by police force if he does not vacate of his own.
If any extension of time to vacate is desired, that F application should be filed well in advance.
The Interlocutory Application is allowed accordingly.
N.J.
Interlocutory Application allowed.