Supreme Court of India

DAKSHABEN B. PATEL versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF DAMAN AND DIU AND 4 ORS. on 10 November 1995

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

A

DAKSHABEN B. PATEL

v.

THE ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF DAMAN AND DIU AND 4 ORS.

NOVEMBER 10, 1995

B [K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.]

Se1vice Law:

Regulmisation-Tlibunal extending time for obtaining M. Phil De-C gree-Employee obtaining the degree within the extended time-Case to be refen-ed to UPSC for regulmisation-Directions issued.

This appeal is against the Tribunal's order dated January 13, 1992 extending six months' time to obtain the M. Phil Degree.

D Allowing the appeal, this Court

HELD : The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. Phil in Economics. Respondents are directed to refer the case of the E · appellant for regularisation to the UPSC which would be done according to rules. [437-A-B]

F

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 10539 of 1995.

From the Judgment and Order dated 19.6.95 of the Central Ad-ministrative Tribunal, Bombay in Misc. P. No. 1269/94 in O.A. No. 1177 of 1993.

G

K. Madhava Reddy and P.D. Sharma for the Appellant.

K. Lahiri, B.K. Prasad, Niranjana Singh, S.N. Tardol, Ms. Sushma Suri and C.S. Babu for the Respondent No. 1 for UPSC.

The following Order of the Court was delivered :

H Leave granted.

D.B.PATELv. U.T.OFDAMANANDDIU

The Tribunal, vide order dated January 13, 1992 with the consent of A

the counsel for the respondents, had extended six months' time to obtain the M. Phil Degree. The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. Phil in Economics. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed and O.A. stands disposed of.

B

Respondents are directed to refer the case of the appellant for regularisation to the UPSC which would be done according to rules.

Appeal allowed.

G.N.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead