Jharkhand High Court
CWJC/3383/1998 of SANTOSH KUMAR MAHTO Vs STATE OF BIHAR And ORS on 1 January 1998
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.W.J.C. No. 3383 of 1998(P) ... Vijay Kumar … …Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Bihar and Ors. ... ...Respondents … CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH … For the Petitioner : - Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHIC.W.J.C. No. 3383 of 1998(P)
...
Vijay Kumar……Petitioner-V e r s u s-The State of Bihar and Ors.......Respondents …
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
…
For the Petitioner: - Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv.For the Respondent: -
....
06/11.07.2014 It has been pointed out by Mr. Binod Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that though he has filed Vakalatnama in the matter on 16.05.2004, but his name has not been reflected in the cause list, for which earlier also the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and restored thereafter.
In that view of the matter, let the name of Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate be reflected in the cause list henceforth as learned counsel for the petitioner.
List this case after one week.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…