Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10260/2017 of RAGHUVEER C @ RAGHU @ GONNERAGHU Vs STATE BY CHANDRA LAYOUT P.S on 28 December 2017
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO Crl.P.No.10260/2017 Between: 1. Raghuveer C @ Raghu @ Gonneraghu S/o Chaluvanarayanaswamy, Aged about 25 years Residing at No.61 4th Cross, 1st Main, Vinayaka Layout,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|DATED THIS THE 28[TH]DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO>
Cri.P.No.10260/2017
Between:
1. Raghuveer C @ Raghu @ GonneraghuS/o Cnaluvanarayanaswamy,Aged about 25 years.Residing at No.61.4[0 ]Cross, 1[+0]Malin, Vinayaka Layout, NayandahalliMysore Road|Bangalore 560 039
2. Sri Sunil H @ Setu,|Aged about 24 years S/o Sri Hari Om SinghC/o LeelavatniiAdjacent road of Bhuvanesnwari Condiments, Halegevaddaranailll,Pattanagare Main road,Rajarajyeswarl Nagar,Bengaluru 560 040|... Petitioners(By Sri. Laksnmikantn K, Adv.,)
And:
State By Cnandra Layout P.S.Represented by State Public Prosecutor|High Court buildingBangalore 560 OO1
... Respondent
(By Sri. K Nagesnwarappa-HCGP)
This Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.|praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.601/2017 ofChandra Layout Police Station, Bengaluru for the offence|punishable under Section 307 r/w 34 of IPC. |
This Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court|made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and.learned HCGP for the State.
2. This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.|seeking to enlarge the petitioners No.1 and 2, who are|accused No.1 and 5 on bail in Cr.No.601 /2017 by the)respondent police for the offence punishable under Section.307 r/w Section 34 of IPC.
3. The substance of the case is that,a case is registeredon the basis of the complaint lodged by the complainant, on28.11.2017, wherein he has stated that while he was.returning from work by nis motor cycle bearing NO.KA-41-EG-7319, on 27.11.2017, at 10 p.m. near Nayandanalli within|the vicinity of graveyard, petitioners herein, who are Accused Nos.1 and 5 along witn other accused persons attacked him|and obstructed him from proceeding further and assaulted|nim with stones causing bleeding injuries. Thus, an attempt.was mace on his life.
4 Learned HCPGP would submit that there are two|other criminal cases are pending against the petitioner|No.1(A1). Hence he opposes for grant of bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case|and also the _ petitioners are in Judicial custody fro28.11.2017 and the allegations have to be proved at the trial,the petitioners have made out a case for grant of bail.
6. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Tne petitioners|are entitled to be enlarged on bail in connection with Crime|No.601/2017 on the file of respondent- Cnandra Layout Police|Station for the offences punishable under Section 307 r/w|Section 34 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:
2>Tne petitioners snail execute a personalbond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one|lakh only) each with one surety for the like|sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional|Magistrate.
il)The petitioners shall not terorrize thewitnesses nor tamper the prosecution evidenceIn any manner.
i)Thepetitioners|Snallmark.their.attendance before the Investigating Officer on)every Saturday between 9.00p.m. and 10p.m. till|the examination of CWs 1 and 27 before the trialcourt..
Psg
Sd/-|JUDGE|