Karnataka High Court

WP/35853/2024 of CHELUVARAJU Vs SMT SHIVAMMA on 31 December 2024

Cites 1, Cited by 0

2024:KHC:53335 WP No. 35853 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 35853 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: CHELUVARAJU S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT IMMAVU VILLAGE, CHATRA

Digitally signedby SHWETHARAGHAVENDRALocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31[ST] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ -WRIT PETITION NO. 35853 OF 2024 (GMCPC)

BETWEEN:

CHELUVARAJU S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT IMMAVU VILLAGE, CHATRA HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, PIN - 571 302.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SMT SHIVAMMA D/O LATE SRI PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 184, POURAKARMIKA COLONY, JYOTHI NAGAR GAYATHIPURAM 2[ND] STAGE, MYSURU - 570 019.

SMT. GOWRAMMA (DEAD BY LRS)

2. CHIKKANNA D/O LATE MADEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

3. MAHADEVAMMA D/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

- 2 -

4. SUSHEELA S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

5. PARVATHI

S/O CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

6. SRI. P DODDAIAH S/O LATE PUTTASAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS S/O LATE PUTTASAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS

7. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

8. D NAGARAJ S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

9. D MANJUNATH S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

10.D SHANKARA S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O SRI P DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

11.SMT. PUTTAJAVARAMMA W/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS W/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS

12.K SHIVALINGU S/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

13.VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS D/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

NC: 2024:KHC:53335

14.INDRAMMA

W/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

R-2 TO R-14 ARE R/AT D.NO.24, 3[RD] CROSS, GAYATHRIPURAM, 1[ST] STAGE, NAZARBAD, MYSORE.

C N CHANDRASHEKAR DEAD BY LRS

15.NAGAPRASAD C S/O LATE C S CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

16.NAGARAJ C

S/O LATE C S CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

R-14 AND R-15 ARE RESIDING AT

NO. 143/1 13[TH] CROSS, 10[TH] MAIN, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU - 570 009.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE LEARNED IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) AT MYSURU TO DISPOSE THE FDP NO.98/2023 AT ANNEXURE C WITHOUT CAUSING UNNECESSARY DELAY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. II)GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

i)Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the learned IV Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Div) at Mysuru to dispose the FDP No.98/2023 at Annexure C without causing unnecessary delay. In the interest of justice. or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the learned IV Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Div) at Mysuru to dispose the FDP No.98/2023 at Annexure C without causing unnecessary delay. In the interest of justice.

ii)Grant such other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.

2. By way of above petition the petitioner seeks for a direction to the FDP Court for expediting disposal of the FDP No.98/2023. Being of the considered opinion that the said FDP is filed in the year 2023, such a direction cannot be issued. direction to the FDP Court for expediting disposal of the FDP No.98/2023. Being of the considered opinion that the said FDP is filed in the year 2023, such a direction cannot be issued.

3. The writ petition is hereby dismissed.

SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead