Supreme Court of India

SEEMA versus ASHWANI KUMAR on 15 April 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SEEMA

v.

ASHW ANI KUMAR

A

APRIL 15, 2005

[ARIJIT PASAYAT ANO S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.)

B

Family Law:

Record of marriages-Dates of marriages and parties to marriage-Record of-To be kept by official to be auhorised by State Government- C Necessity of Legislation-Court suggesting State Governments to consider issuing of executive instructions which may be made enforceable in terms of orders of Supreme Court, till suitable legislation in this regard is made-Legislation-Necessity of-Suggested CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition (C) No. 29 I of D 2005.

Balraj Dewan for the Petitioner.

The following Proceeding/Order of the Court was delivered :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

E

Issue notice.

Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay also.

There shall be interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2004 entitled Ashwani Kumar v. Seema, pending before Learned Addi. District Judge, Delhi.

F

During the hearing of this petition, it appeared to us that in the absence of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage, problems. G come up which have far-reaching consequences. We, therefore, request learned Solicitor General to consider whether Government orders by way of executive instructins can be issued, on the basis of directions of this Court, to various States and Union Territories to authorise officials specifically to keep record H

650

SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2005) 3 S.C.R.

A of marriages so that they can be placed as evidence in different proceedings if the necessity arises. Learned Solicitor General submitted that there may be necessity of a suitable legislation in this regard as the Government Orders/ executive instructions may not suffer. We are of the view that until a suitable legislation is made, the Government Order/executive instructions can. be made B enforceable in terms of the orders of this Court. These may be implemented where there is no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage, and may be done as an additional measure when there is any such prescription.

We have also requested Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. to assist us in this matter. If learned Solicitor General feels and if so advised, he may require C the State Governments regard and the Union Territories to place their views in this regard before him and this Court so that appropriate directions can be issued. A copy of our order be handed over to learned Solicitor General and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. for necessary steps in this matter.

R.P.

Notice issued.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead