Supreme Court of India
M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. on 20 October 2021
1094
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2021] 6 S.C.R.
A
M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD.
v.
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
(Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021)
B
In
(Civil Appeal No 5728 of 2021)
October 20, 2021
[DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD ANDCBV NAGARATHNA, JJ.]
Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Typographical error in thejudgment – Correction of – Amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 croresmentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment to be read as Rs 5.6crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively – Amount of Rs 67 crores inDparagraph 10 of the judgment to be read as Rs 67 lakhs –Appearances of Mr S K Bagaria and Mr Saket Singh in paragraph15 to be read as Mr S K Bagaria, learned Senior Counsel and MrSaket Singh, learned Counsel, respectively – Judgment/Order.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous ApplicationENo.1608 of 2021
In
Civil Appeal No.5728 of 2021
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.09.2017 of the High CourtFof Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4300 of 2015.
Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Advs. for the appellant.Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Advs. for the Respondents.The Order of the Court was passed :
G
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
2
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction ofa typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021.
2. The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned inHparagraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively and the amount of Rs 67 crores in paragraph10 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 67 lakhs.
3. In paragraph 15 of the judgment, the appearances of Mr S KBagaria and Mr Saket Singh shall be corrected to read as Mr S K Bagaria,learned Senior Counsel and Mr Saket Singh, learned Counsel,respectively.
4. The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.
Nidhi Jain
Miscellaneous Application disposed of.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H