Gujarat High Court

LPA/292/2002 of STATE OF GUJARAT Vs PARAG NAVINCHANDRA JASH on 7 April 2003

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 292 of 2002 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8193 of 2001 and CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4035 OF 2002 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 292 of 2002

in

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8193 of 2001

and

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4035 OF 2002

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS

and

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF GUJARATVersus PARAG NAVINCHANDRA JASH

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR RC KODEKAR, AGP for Appellant/applicants in Letters Patent Appeal and Civil Applications MR MUKESH R SHAH for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS

and

MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA

COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT

(Per : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS)

Page 1 of 2

Learned AGP Mr.Kodekar, after having taken instruction from Shri N.D.Hadiyal, Deputy Mamlatdar, Collector Office, Gandhinagar, states that the appellants shall carry out the directions of the learned Single Judge by reconsidering the matter for fixing the market price in respect of the land in question involved in Special Civil Application No.8193 of 2001, after hearing the petitioners of the said petition, within two months from today. In view of this, in our opinion, nothing further is required to be done in the matter. This from today. In view of this, in our opinion, nothing further is required to be done in the matter. This Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly disposed of in view of the statement as above.

In view of the order as above, the Civil Application for stay does not survive and is accordingly stands disposed of. The notice issued therein shall stand discharged. No costs.

Direct service is permitted.

����(Kshitij R. Vyas, J.)

����(Akshay H. Mehta, J.)

Sreeram.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead