Supreme Court of India
R. BALAKRISHNA BHAT & ORS. ETC. versus BANK OF BARODA & ORS. ETC. on 16 May 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
469
R. BALAKRISHNA BHAT & ORS. ETC.
A
v.
BANK OF BARODA & ORS. ETC.
(Civil Appeal Nos. 3762-3764 of 2014)
B
MAY 16, 2018
[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.]
Service law: Pension – Dearness allowance – Controversy inthe present appeals are similar to that arising in the case reportedin [2018] 5 SCR 436 – Present appeals dismissed in terms of saidjudgment.
C
Indian Overseas Bank and Another v. C.R.Chandrasekaran etc. decided by Supreme Court inCivil Appeal Nos. 8420-8421 of 2013 on 01.02.2017
– referred to.
D
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 3762-3764 of 2014.E
From the Judgment and Order dated 09.10.2013 of the High Courtof Madras in Writ Appeal Nos. 1127-1129 of 2013.
F
R.P. (C) No.1201 of 2017 in C.A. No.8424 of 2013
Ms. V. Mohana, V. K. Bali, R. Viduthalai, Sukumar Pattjoshi,Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advs., Rajshekhar Rao, Sewaram, K. Harsha Vardhan,Ms. Kruttika Vijay, Abhinav Mukerji, Aditya Soni, K.V. Jagdishvaran,Mrs. G. Indira, Bhupendra Singh Chauhan, Nishe Rajen Shonker,V. G. Pragasam, Rajesh Kumar, Gaurav Kr. Singh, Advs. for theappearing parties.
G
H
AThe Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. These appeals by special leavearise out of Judgment and Order dated 09.10.2013 passed by the HighCourt of Judicature at Madras allowing Writ Appeal Nos.1127 to 1129of 2013 and dismissing Writ Petition Nos.6632 of 2007, 9952 of 2007Band 14983 of 2007.
2. The aforesaid Writ Petitions preferred by the present appellantswere allowed by Single Judge of High Court vide common Judgmentand Order dated 14.12.2012. While setting aside the decision of theSingle Judge, the Division Bench relied upon its Judgment rendered inCWrit Appeal No.355 of 2013 and allied matters (Indian Overseas Bankand Another v. C.R. Chandrasekaran etc.)
3. Said Judgment rendered in Indian Overseas Bank andAnother v. C.R. Chandrasekaran etc. by the Division Bench wasaffirmed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.8420-8421 of 2013 vide orderdated 01.02.2017.D
4. The controversy in the present appeals is similar to that arisingin Union Bank of India vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ WelfareAssociations and others which have been disposed of by us vide Judgmentof even date. Since the issues involved in the present matter are identical,Ethese appeals are dismissed in terms of our Judgment rendered in UnitedBank of India and Others etc.
5. The appeals and review petitions, therefore, stand dismissed.No order as to costs.
FDevika Gujral
Appeals and Review Petitions dismissed.
G
H