Karnataka High Court

SECOND APPEAL 5117 of 2008 on 29 March 1995

MOHANKUMAR

B SHELAR

Digitally signed byMOHANKUMAR BSHELARLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH

RSA No. 5117 of 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1[ST] DAY OF APRIL, 2025

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH -REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 5117 OF 2008 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

SIDDAPPA SIDRAMAPPA BADAWADAGI,

AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED TEACHER, R/O. BAGALKOT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. P.H. GOTKHINDI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. GOPAL KEDARNATH PESALE @ PATIL,

SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS

1(A)MAITRABAI GOPAL PISALE @ PATIL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. 97-E, G OLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007. SHOLAPUR-413007.

1(B)VIJAYA GOPAL PATIL @ PISALE, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 97-E, G OLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007. AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 97-E, G OLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007.

1(C)RANAJEET GOPAL PATIL @ PISALE, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O. 97-E, G OLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007. AGED 38 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O. 97-E, G OLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007.

2. GAJANAN S/O. KEDARNATH PISALE @ PATIL, AGE: MAJOR BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, PIRAJI RAHOBA WADAKAR, AGE: MAJOR OCC: SERVICE, R/O. BAGALKOT-587101. R/O. BAGALKOT-587101.

3. SAROJINI W/O. JOTIBA JADHAV,

AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

Page 1 of 2

R/O. BAGALKOT-587101.

4. KAVITA D/O. JOTIBA JADHAV,

5. SUNITA D/O. JOTIBA JADHAV,

6. SUDHA D/O. JOTIBA JADHAV,

(SINCE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR

MINOR GUARDIAN

SAROJINI JOTIBA JADHAV,

R/O. BAGALKOT-587101)

7. PRAMILA PANDURANG PAWAR, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. PANDHARAPUR, DIST: SHOLAPUR-413007.

8. ANILKUMAR KEDARNATH PISALE, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 97-E GOLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007. AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 97-E GOLD PINCH PETH, SHOLAPUR-413007.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. P.A. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A-C), R2 & R3; NOTICE TO R7 & R8 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) NOTICE TO R7 & R8 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) BAGALKOT IN R.A.NO.59 OF 95 AND ALSO IN O.S.NO.6/90 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF BAGALKOT AND ON PERUSUAL OF THE SAME BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06-06-08, AND 29.3.1995 RESPECTIVELY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5799

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

ORAL JUDGMENT

No representation on behalf of the appellant.

Perusal of the previous order sheet would indicate that there was no representation on behalf of the appellant on 30.05.2024, 13.06.2024, 27.06.2024 and 15.07.2024 and as on today also.

In that view of the matter, the appellant is not interested to prosecute the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

SH CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead