Karnataka High Court

MFA/23763/2010 of SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG, Vs SRI. ABDUL KHALEEL S/O ABDUL SATTAR, on 15 December 2010

COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2010 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SABHAHIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23763 OF 2010 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKABENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 15[TH]DAY OF DECEBEMBBER 20

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SABHAHIT

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

MISCKELLANBOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23763 OF 201

BETWEEN:

1.SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,

2.KUMAR. MANOJ YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

3.KUMAR. KRISHNA @ MITHUNS/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 3-1/2 YEARS,S/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 3-1/2 YEARS,

4.KALAMMA W/O MARIYAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, ALL ARE R/O JUNI PETH, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.

~~. APPELLANTS

(By Sri. /Smt: K ANANDKUMAR, ADV.)

AND:

1.SRI. ABDUL KHALEEL S/O ABDUL SATTAR,AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,R/O H. NO. 1/530/2, PALTANA STREET,GOVIND ROAD, KOPPAL,DIST: KOPPAL,AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,R/O H. NO. 1/530/2, PALTANA STREET,GOVIND ROAD, KOPPAL,DIST: KOPPAL,

2.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, V/45, IIND FLOOR, YELMANCHILLI COMPLEX,STATION ROAD, HOSPET,THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER,CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM.STATION ROAD, HOSPET,THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER,CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM.

Page 1 of 2

— RESPONDENTS

mK OK OK

This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of MotorVehicles Act, 1998, against the Judgment and Award dated 05/05/2010 passedin MVC. No. 213/2008 on the file of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge & Addl.MACT, Belgaum.

This appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court Orderedthe following;

ORDER

Four weeks time granted finally to comply with the office objectionsfailing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without anyfurther orders from this coutt.

//COPY//

SD /JUDGE

As per the endorsement dated: 06/07/11 made in the Order Sheet theAdvocate for the appellants have not complied with the office objections,Hence, this MFA No. 23763/2010 stands dismissed as per the Court orderdated 15/12/2010.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Seal

Sd/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

RK-bBC-By:T-By: nd

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead