Karnataka High Court
MFA/23763/2010 of SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG, Vs SRI. ABDUL KHALEEL S/O ABDUL SATTAR, on 15 December 2010
COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2010 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SABHAHIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23763 OF 2010 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKABENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 15[TH]DAY OF DECEBEMBBER 20
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SABHAHIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
MISCKELLANBOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23763 OF 201
BETWEEN:
1.SMT. GEETA W/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
2.KUMAR. MANOJ YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
3.KUMAR. KRISHNA @ MITHUNS/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 3-1/2 YEARS,S/O YALLAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 3-1/2 YEARS,
4.KALAMMA W/O MARIYAPPA RAIBAG,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, ALL ARE R/O JUNI PETH, TQ: RAIBAG,DIST: BELGAUM.
~~. APPELLANTS
(By Sri. /Smt: K ANANDKUMAR, ADV.)
AND:
1.SRI. ABDUL KHALEEL S/O ABDUL SATTAR,AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,R/O H. NO. 1/530/2, PALTANA STREET,GOVIND ROAD, KOPPAL,DIST: KOPPAL,AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,R/O H. NO. 1/530/2, PALTANA STREET,GOVIND ROAD, KOPPAL,DIST: KOPPAL,
2.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, V/45, IIND FLOOR, YELMANCHILLI COMPLEX,STATION ROAD, HOSPET,THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER,CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM.STATION ROAD, HOSPET,THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER,CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM.
Page 1 of 2
— RESPONDENTS
mK OK OK
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of MotorVehicles Act, 1998, against the Judgment and Award dated 05/05/2010 passedin MVC. No. 213/2008 on the file of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge & Addl.MACT, Belgaum.
This appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court Orderedthe following;
ORDER
Four weeks time granted finally to comply with the office objectionsfailing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without anyfurther orders from this coutt.
//COPY//
SD /JUDGE
As per the endorsement dated: 06/07/11 made in the Order Sheet theAdvocate for the appellants have not complied with the office objections,Hence, this MFA No. 23763/2010 stands dismissed as per the Court orderdated 15/12/2010.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Seal
Sd/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
RK-bBC-By:T-By: nd
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…