Gujarat High Court
ITR/80/1988 of KANTILAL C PATEL Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX on 5 December 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 80 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL Sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 80 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL Sd/-
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTILAL C PATEL
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MJ SHAH WITH MR JP SHAH for Applicant.
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 05/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
At the time of hearing of this reference it has been submitted by learned Advocate Shri Manish Shah appearing for the applicant-assessee that he has been instructed by the assessee not to press the said reference. Thus, we leave the question unanswered.
The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
���Sd/-��Sd/-
��(B.C.Patel,J) (D.A.Mehta, J)