Karnataka High Court

WP/62043/2009 of SHRI ANAND GOPAL PADIYAR DESAI Vs SHRI PANDURANG NARSING KADAM on 10 December 2009

COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD Dated this the 10th day of December 2009 Before THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA WRIT PETITION No.62043 OF 2009(GM-CPC) BETWEEN SHRI ANAND GOPAL PADIYAR DESAI AGE MAJOR.OCC: NIL, R/O 1905, KADOLKAR GALLI, BELGAUM. ... PETITIONER (By Sri.S W KULKARNI,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKACIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD

Dated this the 10[th]day of December 2009

Before

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA

WRIT PETITION No.62043 OF 2009(GM-CPC)

BETWEEN

SHRI ANAND GOPAL PADIYAR DESAIAGE MAJOR.OCC: NIL, R/O 1905,KADOLKAR GALLI, BELGAUM.

_ PRTITIONBR

(By Sri.S W KULKARNI, ADV)

ANT

SHRI PANDURANG NARSING KADAMAGE MAJOR, OCC BUSINESSR/O SUJI BUILDING GURUWARPETTILAKWADI BELGAUM

... RESPONDENT

This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 & 227 oft thConstitution of India, praying to quash and set aside theimpugned order passed on JA NO.o by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn),Belgaum in O.s.NO.75/2005 now pending before the saidcourt and the certified copy of the entire order sheet with theimpugned order is marked and produced herewith atAnnexures-A and Annexures B and C are the certilied copiesof the plaint and written statements respectively.

This petition coming on for orders this day, the Courtdelivered the following;

ORDER

Page 1 of 2

On 06-10-2009, a week’s time has been granted as a lastChance to comply with the office objections. Thereaiter, on19.11.2009 a week’s time has been granted to comply with theoffice objections. Inspite of that, office objections have notbeen complied with. However, in the interest of Justice, aweek's time is granted to comply with the office objections. Iithe objections are not complied within one week from today,the writ petition stands dismissed automatically withoutfurther reference to the court.

SD/-JUDGE.

READ: The endorsement dated 2/1/2010 made by thePending Branch to the effect that the office objection has not beencomplied with.

As per the Order dated 10/12/2009, the Advocate ior thePetitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence,this WP No.62043/09 stands dismissed as on 2/1/2010without reference to the Court, as per the Court Order dated10/12/2009.

Seal

BY ORDER

Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR$

R- By:-C- By:-

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead