Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9935/2017 of MR HARSHA SIMHA S R Vs STATE BY KENGERI POLICE STATION on 28 December 2017
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9935/2017 BETWEEN 1. MR.HARSHA SIMHA S.R S/O S.K.RADHA KRISHNA NO.1038, 2ND RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGARA, BENGALURU – 560
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 28[THI]DAY OF DECEMBER 201/
BEFORE.
THE HON'’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9935/201/
BETWEEN
1.MR.HARSHA SIMHA S.R
S/O S.K.RADHA KRISHNA
NO.1038, 2[ND]RAILWAYPARALLEL ROAD,KENGERI UPANAGARA,,BENGALURU - 560 O60.PARALLEL ROAD,KENGERI UPANAGARA,,BENGALURU - 560 O60.
2.HLIENDRA KUMAR PATEL
S/O SOMJI H PATEL.
NO.1031/72, 2[ND]RAILWAYPARALLEL ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGARA,,BENGALURU - 560 OOO.PARALLEL ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGARA,,BENGALURU - 560 OOO.
‘3.MRUNAL KAUSIK K L S/O NARAYAN KL# 681, 1[ST]C MAIN, 24[ND]CROSSBANASHANKARI 3[RD]STAGE,K.G.LAYOUT,BENGALURU - 560 O85.|S/O NARAYAN KL# 681, 1[ST]C MAIN, 24[ND]CROSSBANASHANKARI 3[RD]STAGE,K.G.LAYOUT,BENGALURU - 560 O85.|
(BY SRI.LSANDEEP HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
PETITIONERS|
AND
STATEBY KENGERI POLICE STATION.BENGALURU SOUTH,BENGALURU - 560 O60.REP BY SPP|HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.BENGALURU - 560 OO1.
RESPONDENT |
(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP))
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS|ONBALLIN||THEEVEN/OF|THELR|ARREST.INCR.NO.369/201/7OF|KENGERIPOLICESTATION,BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER|SECTION 42720 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking for grant|of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., for the.offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34of IPC registered by the respondent-Police bearing FIR-No.369/201/7.
2. The case of the complainant is that he had_invested an amount of Rupees two crores and ae promissory note was executed in this regard. Later, wnen|asked for repayment, accused issued two cneques for a.sum of Rs.10,00,000/- each in the name of his wife. Due)to insufficient funds, the cneques were dishonoured and)case came to be lodged against the accused.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submitthat the case is being filed by the complainant against thepresent petitioner as he was former employer of accused.|
4. Learned High Court Govt. Pleader submits that the matter is still under investigation and the petition may be)rejected.
5. Tnere are no grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Petition is rejected.
bnv*
Sd/-|
JUDGE.