Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/24587/2011 of KHUSHWINDER KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 29 December 2011
of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.24587 of 2011 Date of decision : 29.12.2011 Khushwinder Kumar ................Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present:- Mr. Tribhavan Singla, Advocate,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CWP No.24587 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
*****
CWP No.24587 of 2011Date of decision : 29.12.2011
Khushwinder Kumar
Vs.
................Petitioner
State of Punjab and others
.......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN
Present:- Mr. Tribhavan Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner
---
-K.KANNAN, J (ORAL) :
The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that he has been ordered tobe transferred on 23.12.2011 from Block Sanaur (Patiala) to Block SidhwanBet (Ludhiana). According to him, this transfer has been made toaccommodate the 5[th] respondent-Ajaib Singh, who had been promoted andposted at Block Sanaur (Patiala) from Block Sidhwan Bet (Ludhiana), onemonth earlier and the present transfer has been made only to accommodatethe 5[th] respondent at Block Sanaur (Patiala). According to the petitioner, thisis against the transfer policy declared by the Government of Punjab itself.
The policy guidelines do not give any vested right to any employeeto seek for its compliance and these are at best guidelines to theAdministration to follow as far as possible and there must be strongestreasons to make any deviation from the guidelines.
The petitioner is at liberty to make a representation on the basis ofthe policy and any particular grievance that he may have, against theimpugned order.
CWP No.24587 of 2011
The writ petition itself may also be treated as the petitioner'srepresentation and if such representation is made to respondent No.1, thesame shall be considered and the decision shall be taken within two weeks.Subject to this liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
29.12.2011akm
(K.KANNAN) JUDGE