Supreme Court of India
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus SUNIL KUMAR & ANR. on 1 December 2017
(2017) l l S.C.R. 137
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
A
v.
SUNIL KUMAR & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 9694 of2013) DECEMBEROl,2017
B
[RANJAN GOGOi AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - s.163A - Clarification given with respect to decision dated 24.11.2017 reported in {2017] II S.C.R. 130.
c
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 9694
of2013.
From the Judgment and Order dated I 0.10.2011 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in MAC Appeal No. 900/2011.
D
Amit Kumar Singh, Mrs. E. Enatoli Serna (for Mis. Law Associates), Ad vs. for the Appellant.
Ajay Kumartalesara,Amit Singh Chauhan, Ms. Nidhi. Vipin Nair,
P. B. Suresh, Abbay Pratap Singh, Advs. for the Respondents.
The following Order of the Court was delivered:
E
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
1
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Paragraph. I I of the Judgment dated 24.11.2017 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 9694 of2013 reads as follows:- "11. As the final disposal of the appeal may take some time,we are of the view that 50% of the compensation that is presently . lying in deposit in the Registry in terms of the Order dated 24.02.2012 should be released to the claimant on due identification."
F
Upon a mention being made by the learned counsel for the respondent(s), the said paragraph will now be read to mean that the . amount lying in deposit in the trial Court be released to the claimant(s) on due identification.
G
H