Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9989/2017 of NAGARAJ T @ APACHE NAGA @ NAGA Vs THE STATE BY BYDARAHALLI POLICE STATION on 28 December 2017
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9989 OF 2017 BETWEEN: NAGARAJ T @ APACHE NAGA @ NAGA S/O THIMMEGOWDA AGE: 18 YEARS, STUDENT R/ A NEAR RAGI MACHINE 6TH CROSS, VIGNESHWARA NAGAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28[TH|]DAY OF DECEMBER 2701/
BEFORE.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NOQ.9989 OF 201
BEIT WEE
NAGARAJ T @ APACHE NAGA @ NAGA|S/O THIMMEGOWDAAGE: 18 YEARS, STUDENT|R/A NEAR RAGI MACHINE|#[TR]CROSS, VIGNESHWARA NAGAR|HEROHALLI WARDBENGALURU - 560 OSL... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.M.R.BALAKRISHNA, ADV.)
AND#
THE STATE BY BYDARAHALLI POLICE STATIONMAGADI SUB-DIVISION.BENGALURU RURAL DIST.REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTORHIGH COURT BUILDINGBENGALURU - 560 OOL.— RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 ofCr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in'Cr.No.643/2017 of Byadarahalli P.S., Ramanagara District|for the offence punisnable under Section 397 of IPC.
This Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Courtmade the following:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
ThesubstanceOF the complaintISthat|ON|27.11.2017 in the morning at 11 a.m., a complaint was.lodged stating that on 20.11.2017 at about 9.30 p.m.after dinner, the complainant was walking near BMTC bus|stand and two motorcycles being driven by strangers.came from opposite direction and waylaid the complainant|and his friend and robbed mobile sets. The petitioner was|arrested on 28.11.2017.
2. Learned High Court Government Pleader opposes|the application.
3. In the context of circumstances, on considering|the complaint and the submissions made by the learned|counsel, I am of the sincere view that it is just and proper.to grant relief to the petitioner. The apprehensions of the.prosecution however could be resolved by imposing.conditions. —
4 |Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Thepetitioner/accused is ordered to be released on bail for theoffence punishable under Section 397 of IPC registered in.
4 |Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The Crime No.643/2017, subject to the following conditions:
)-*The petitioner has to execute a personalbond|fOr|=50,000/-(Rupeesfiftythousand only) and nas to furnish onesolvent surety of a person possessingimmovable properties, for the likesum tothe satisfaction of the concerned Court. |bond|fOr|=50,000/-(Rupeesfiftythousand only) and nas to furnish onesolvent surety of a person possessingimmovable properties, for the likesum tothe satisfaction of the concerned Court. |
)--*He shall not tamper with any of theprosecutionwitnesses,directlyOT|indirectly. |prosecutionwitnesses,directlyOT|indirectly. |
)---*He has to appear before the concernedCourt regularly.Court regularly.
)-C*He has to mark his attendance before theInvestigating Officer at 9 p.m. on everysecond and third Saturday of each monthuntil further orders by the Trial Court.Investigating Officer at 9 p.m. on everysecond and third Saturday of each monthuntil further orders by the Trial Court.
RV
Sd/-_
JUDGE