Karnataka High Court
WP/62165/2009 of SMT NIRMALA W/O HANAMANT BODAS Vs GURUDEV BALKRISHNA JOSHI on 10 December 2009
COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD Dated this the 10th day of December 2009 Before THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA WRIT PETITION No.62165 OF 2009(GM-CPC) BETWEEN 1. SMT NIRMALA W/O HANAMANT BODAS AGE :82 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEHOLD, R/O H.NO.213 KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM. 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKACIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD
Dated this the 10[th]day of December 2009
Betore
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA
WRIT PETITION No.62165 OF 2009(GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
1. OMT NIRMALA W/O HANAMANT BODASAGE :82 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEHOLD, R/O H.NO.213KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.AGE :82 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEHOLD, R/O H.NO.213KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.
2. SHRI.BABU S/O HANAMANT BODAS
AGE :695 YEARS, OCC :BUSINESS R/O H NO.213KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.
3. SHRI.JAYANT S/O HANAMANT BODASAGE :57 YEARS, OCC :BUSINESS R/O H NO.213,KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.AGE :57 YEARS, OCC :BUSINESS R/O H NO.213,KALMESHWAR GALLI, ANAGOL, BELGAUM.
... PETITIONBRS
(By Sri./Smt: 58 8S PATIL,ADV
AND
GURUDEV BALKRISHNA JOSHIAGE : 592 YEARS, OCC SERVICER/O 212/A,KALMESHWAR GALLI,ANAGOL,BELGAUM
... RESPONDENT
******
This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 & 227 oft thConstitution of India, praying to quash the order passed bythe I Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Belgaum in O.S.No.179/08dated 10/02/2009 at Annexure-E.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Courtdelivered the following; OR DER
Page 1 of 2
On 06-10-2009, a week’s time has been granted as a lastChance to comply with the office objections. Thereaiter, on19.11.2009 a week’s time has been granted to comply with theoffice objections. Inspite of that, office objections have notbeen complied with. However, in the interest of Justice, aweek's time is granted to comply with the office objections. Iithe objections are not complied within one week from today,the writ petition stands dismissed automatically withoutfurther reterence to the court.
SD/-JUDGE.
READ: The endorsement dated 2/1/2010 made by thePending Branch to the effect that the office objection has not beencomplied with.
As per the Order dated 10/12/2009, the Advocate for thePetitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence,this WP No.62165/09 stands dismissed as on 2/1/2010without reference to the Court, as per the Court Order dated10/12/2009.
BY ORDER
Seal
R- By:-
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR*
C- By:-
T- By:- sr.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…