Jharkhand High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 66/2024 on 28 December 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:31624 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHIB.A. No. 7209 of 2025
------
Rajesh Verma @ Rajesh Barma, aged about 35 years, S/o. Ramchandra Verma, R/o. Vill.- Ranighaghar, P.O.- Jaruwadih, P.S.- Masalia, Dist. Dumka, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
-Versus -
The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Shekhar No. 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P.
------
04/14.10.2025
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No. 66/2024, for the offences registered under Section 311 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, subsequently Sections 103(1), 317(1), 55 & 56 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act were added, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka. Case No. 66/2024, for the offences registered under Section 311 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, subsequently Sections 103(1), 317(1), 55 & 56 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act were added, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka.
3. On 28.12.2024 at about 6:00 P.M., husband of the informant was waylaid by three unknown persons between Tasariya and Ajmeri More. It is alleged that the accused persons looted his jewelries and money. It is further alleged that the accused persons shot the husband of the informant due to which, he died. waylaid by three unknown persons between Tasariya and Ajmeri More. It is alleged that the accused persons looted his jewelries and money. It is further alleged that the accused persons shot the husband of the informant due to which, he died.
4. It was submitted that petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor he was put on T.I. Parade. It was further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It was also submitted that looted jewelries were recovered from co-accused Sakir Ansari @ Faidari, who has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide B.A. No. 6572/2025. was put on T.I. Parade. It was further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It was also submitted that looted jewelries were recovered from co-accused Sakir Ansari @ Faidari, who has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide B.A. No. 6572/2025.
5. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No. 66/2024. on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No. 66/2024.
(Ambuj Nath, J.)