WRIT PETITION 2009 of 2025 on 2 August 2007

1. The State of Jharkhand 2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Sugarcane, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Sugarcane, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

3. The Joint Agriculture Director, Directorate of Agriculture and Sugarcane, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Krishi Bhawan, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. Sugarcane, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Krishi Bhawan, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

4. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

5. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

6. The Sub-Divisional Agriculture Officer, Giridih, At-Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand.

7. The Accountant General (A&E), Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Shyamli, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. having its office at Shyamli, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

.........Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Pinky Tiwary, AC to AG

Mr. Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Advocate ---- ---- 02/01.05.2025 Theinstant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to make payment of pension and gratuity of the petitioner along with interest after regularizing his services for the period from 02.08.2007 to 19.02.2009, when he was kept waiting for posting, as the petitioner has completed more than 10 years of services under respondents in different establishment but the same is not taken into account by the respondent-authorities.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is fully entitled for the claim made in view of the fact that he was kept waiting for posting during the period from 02.08.2007 to Kunal 19.02.2009 and otherwise also, the petitioner has completed more than 10 years of service under the respondents in different establishment but all these aspects have not been taken into account and even respondents have not considered the representation filed by the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter-affidavit has been filed as such, the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned-respondent so that his grievances may be redressed. counter-affidavit has been filed as such, the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned-respondent so that his grievances may be redressed.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 4[th] Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter with regard to the grievance raised by the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law and applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of 12 weeks. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ application to the respondent-concerned as early as possible. petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 4[th] Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter with regard to the grievance raised by the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law and applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of 12 weeks. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ application to the respondent-concerned as early as possible.

5. If the order would be in favour of the petitioner, then the necessary consequential benefits shall also be extended to him within a further period of 8 weeks. necessary consequential benefits shall also be extended to him within a further period of 8 weeks.

6. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of.

(Deepak Roshan, J.)