Jharkhand High Court

WRIT PETITION 2588 of 2007 on 2 April 1993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (S) No. 2588 of 2007

Mangal Das Bodra

.... Petitioner

Versu

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, HRD Deptt.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Dhurwa, Ranchi

3. District Education Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa

4. Secretary, Managing Committee, Chaibasa .... Respondents

---

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

---

For the Petitioner : Mr. M.M. PanFor the Respondents : Mr. P. Modi For the Respondent No.4: Mr. A. Hussain

-----

06/21.01.2015The grievance of the petitioner is for release of arrears of salary which has been stopped w.e.f. March, 1993.

The submission has been made on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been appointed in the Recognised and Aided Minority High School, Lutheran High School, Chaibasa against the permanent sanctioned post after following due procedure vide appointment letter dated 2.4.1993 which has been approved by the competent authority on 4.12.1993. It has further been submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition service of the petitioner has also been adjusted under non-planned scheme vide letter 147/10 dated 31.7.2010 issued by the respondent no.4. The further submission is that the petitioner has repeatedly represented before the authorities concerned for the release of arrears but no response has been given. Some of the representations have been annexed as annexure no. 5 and 5/1.

Page 1 of 2

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the appropriate decision shall be taken on the grievance of the petitioner. If the grievance of the petitioner is found genuine, the same shall be redressed without any delay.

On the basis of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent nos. 2 by filing a fresh representation raising his grievance with all supporting documents within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the concerned authorities shall take decision in this regard and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

If the petitioner is entitled to get the amount, the same be released within the period aforesaid.

RKM

If any of the claims of the petitioner will be disputed or rejected, the same shall be communicated by passing speaking order within four weeks.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead