Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/45855/2016 of MANGAT RAI @ SONU Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 30 December 2016
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-45855-2016 Date of decision : 30.12.2016 Mangat Rai @ Sonu ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate for Mr. Nikhil Bhatia, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-45855-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-45855-2016Date of decision : 39.12.2016
Mangat Rai @ Sonu
_. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab|
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate forMr. Nikhil Bhatia, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab.
FE 28
AMIT RAWALb>J.(QRAL)
The petitioner is stated to have been involved in an FIR bearingNo.185 dated 22.10.2016 registered under Section 306 of the Indian PenalCode, whereby Rajwinder Kaur, who has already been divorced, hadallegedly committed suicide. Allegation in the FIR is that the petitioner hadan illicit relationship and he is responsible for abetting the deceased oncommitting such crime. >
This Court called upon Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG and he, oninstructions from ASI Guriqbal Singh, submits that till date the police hasnot been able to trace out any email, whatsapp and text messages to primafacie establish the involvement of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is willing tojoin the investigation and provide whatever assistance or information to thepolice in respect of the aforementioned observations.
CRM-M-45855-2016
Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the petitionis allowed and in the event of arrest of the petitioner, the petitioner shall bereleased on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to theconditions contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and he will join theinvestigation as and when required.
30.12.7016Yogesh Sharma
( AMIT RAWAL) >JUDGE
Y
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/ NoWhether ReportableYes/ No Yes/ No |