Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./3209/2013 of MD SADDIQUE ANSARI ALIAS SADDIK ANSARI Vs The State Of Jharkhand on 20 December 2013
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A . No. 3209 of 2013 Md. Saddique Ansari @ Saddik Ansari …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Md. Saddique Ansari @ Saddik Ansari
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…… Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
---------For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary, AdvocateFor the State: A.P.P.--------- th December, 2013
02/Dated: 20
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 323, 313, 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant; that in fact the complainant is residing with the petitioner; that the co-accused, Hazara Bibi has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 1678 of 2013. That the complainant and the petitioner had appeared before the Mediation Center and they have settled their differences.
Learned A.P.P while opposing the prayer for bail has submitted that as per the investigation there is direct allegation against the petitioner.
Considering the fact that the counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case has been compromised between the parties and they have settled their disputes. If the complainant files an affidavit before the Court below and submits that she has compromised the case or is residing with the petitioner, the Court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Devipur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 169 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
With the said observation and direction the anticipatory bail application is hereby disposed of.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)