Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9884/2017 of KIRAN KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 December 2017
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9884/2017 BETWEEN KIRAN KUMAR S/O V.CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/ A NO.321, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BDA LAYOUT, BSK 5TH STAGE, BENGALURU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28[THI]DAY OF DECEMBER 201/
BEFORE.
THE HON'’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAOCRIMINAL PETITION NO.9884/201/
BETWEEN
KIRAN KUMARS/O V.CHIKKANNA,AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,R/A NO.321, 1[ST]CROSS,1[ST]MAIN ROAD, BDA LAYOUT,BSK 5[TH]STAGE,BENGALURU - 560 O85.
PETITIONER
(BY SMT.JAYASHREE R.S, ADVOCATEFOR SRI.G.M.RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,BY SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE,BENGALURU CITY.REP BY SPP|HIGH COURT COMPLEX|BENGALURU - 560 OO1.
. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP))
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER.ON BAIL IN CR.NO.490/2017 OF SUBRAMANYAPURA_POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE.
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 364, 511 READ WITH.SECTION 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Tne case is registered by respondent-Police for tne|offence punishable under Sections 511, 364 read withSection 34 of IPC.
2. The case of the’ prosecution is that thecomplainant's son Arun came in toucn witn Kiran and.thereafter, it turned into a financial transaction. In this.connection, there was a galata and on 0O9.11.2017petween 7.45 p.m., and 8.00 p.m., the petitioner came)near the house of the complainant and kidnapped thecomplainant's grandson Saiesnwar. On hearing the nue.and cry of neighbouring boy, the accused fled away leaving tne victim boy in a dark place. A case came to beregistered against Kiran and his associates.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that aS a back-fire to the financial transaction, the case Is filed on false grounds.
4. Learned High Court Government Pleader would submit that investigation is Under progress.
5. Case is registered against two persons, whereasOnly petitioners name finds a place in the F.I.R. In the)
circumstances, considering the fact that the matter is still under investigation, tnere is no merit in the petition.
Petition is rejected.
pnv*
Sd/-.
JUDGE