Supreme Court of India
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus SAVITRI DEVI AND ORS. on 5 January 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. \'.
SA VITRI DEVI AND ORS.
JANUARY 5, 2004
B [V. N. KHARE, CJ., D.M. DHARMADHIKARI AND S.B. SINHA, JJ.]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Motor accident-Vehicles driven without valid and effective licence-Claim for compe11satio11-Compensation awarded by Tribunal holding insurance company liable to pay with pepiiission to recover the amount from the owner of offending vehicle-Confirmatioq of award by High Court-Special leave petition before Supreme Court-Held: Jn view of facts of the case. award justified.
c
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Special Leave Petition (C) No. D [171 ][of ][2004. ]
From the Judgment and Order dated 7.10.2002 of the Punjab and Haryana High Comt in F.A.0. No. 4965 of 2002.
Ms. Kiran Suri for the Petitioner.
E
The Judgment of the Court was delivered
This Special Leave Petition is directed against a judgment and order dated 7.10.2002 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner herein F [questioning ][an ][award ][made ][by ][Motor ][Accident ][Claims ][Tribunal, ][Ambala ]was dismissed. The High Court passed the said order on the ground that the Petitioner has been permitted to recover the amount from the owner of the offending vehicle. On a perusal of the award impugned before the learned Tribunal it appears that a finding of fact has been arrived at that the vehicle in question was driven by the first respondent without valid and effective G licence as on the date of the accident. While answering issue No. 3 that as to whether insurance company is not liable to make any payment of compensation on account of the preliminary objections taken by it in its written statement, the learned Tribunal observed that although the Petitioner is liable to pay compensation to the claimant, it may recover the same from j {..
-..
.,...
/
the owner of the offending vehicle. A
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, we do not find any merit in this petition and is dismissed. No costs. '
K.K.T.
Petition dismissed.