Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9712/2013 of JAMAL RANGSAJ Vs The State Of Jharkhand on 20 December 2013
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A . No. 9712 of 2013 Jamal Rangsaj …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A . K. Chaturvedy, Advocate & Mr. Rajesh Kr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9712 of 2013
Jamal Rangsaj
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand…… Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Chaturvedy, Advocate &
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate:A.P.P
For the State
---------
03/Dated: 20th December, 2013
The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 304B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 &4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased Ambia Devi @ Rinki who was married to the petitioner's son namely Alam Rangsaj; that the petitioner had never demanded dowry, as alleged, neither he had tortured the informant's daughter; that he had no concern with the matrimonial affairs of the deceased and her husband i.e. his son; that in the case diary, witnesses have stated that on the fateful day there was quarrel between the husband and the wife (since deceased) and the husband slapped her and did not allow her to go to her parental house whereafter, she locked herself in a room and hanged herself; that the postmortem report also suggests that death is due to asphyxia caused by pressing of neck; that none of the witnesses have said anything incriminating against this petitioner.
The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but, has not controverted the submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.244/ 2013 corresponding to G. R. No.1241 of 2013.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)