Jharkhand High Court
Cont.(Cvl)/242/2024 of BASUDEO MANJHI ALIAS BASUDEO YADAV Vs UNION OF INDIA on 20 December 2024
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 242 of 2024 ---------- 1. Basudeo Manjhi @ Basudeo Yadav, son of late Raghunath Manjhi, resident of village Bagjhopa, P.O. Basukinath Dham, P.S. Jama, Dist. Dumka (Jharkhand). 2. Binay Kumar Yadav, son of Basudeo Manjhi @ Basude Yadav, resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 242 of 2024
----------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Basudeo Manjhi @ Basudeo Yadav, son of late Raghunath Manjhi, resident of village Bagjhopa, P.O. Basukinath Dham, P.S. Jama, Dist. Dumka (Jharkhand). village Bagjhopa, P.O. Basukinath Dham, P.S. Jama, Dist. Dumka (Jharkhand). 2.Binay Kumar Yadav, son of Basudeo Manjhi @ Basude Yadav, resident of village Bagjhopa, .P.O. Basukinath Dhan, P.S. Jama, Dist. Dumka (Jharkhand) Bagjhopa, .P.O. Basukinath Dhan, P.S. Jama, Dist. Dumka (Jharkhand)
… … Petitioner
–- V E R S U S
1. Union of India.
2. Sri P.K. Sharma, the Chief Administrative Officer (Construction Organisation), Eastern Railway, 14, Strand Road, New Koilaghat Building (4[th] Floor), Kolkata, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Kolkata (West Bengal)- 700 001. Organisation), Eastern Railway, 14, Strand Road, New Koilaghat Building (4[th] Floor), Kolkata, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Kolkata (West Bengal)- 700 001.
3. Shri Chetna Nand Singh, the Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway, Asansol Division, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Asansol (West Bengal). Railway, Asansol Division, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Asansol (West Bengal).
4. Shri Alind Shekhar, the Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction), Eastern Railway, Asansol Division, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Asansol (West Bengal). Railway, Asansol Division, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Asansol (West Bengal).
……..Opp. Parties.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajshree Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI Ms. Nitu Sinha, CGC
----------
06/ 20.12.2024Heard the parties.
It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with and in compliance of the Court’s order, reasoned order has been passed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped.
Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of.
advised.
However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if so (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)