Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/368/2017 of BIDHAN CHANDRA RAI AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 18 December 2020

COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.368 of 2017 ---- 1. Bidhan Chandra Rai 2. Bhim Rai 3. Dinesh Kumar Sanyashi 4. Prabhawati Kumari 5. Rajeshwar Rai … Petitioners -versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shailesh Kumar Chaurasia, the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Chairman,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.368 of 2017

----

1. Bidhan Chandra Rai

2. Bhim Rai

3. Dinesh Kumar Sanyashi

4. Prabhawati Kumari

… Petitioners

5. Rajeshwar Rai

-versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Shailesh Kumar Chaurasia, the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Chairman, District Establishment Committee, Sahibganj. Chairman, District Establishment Committee, Sahibganj.

3. Jai Govind Singh, the District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj. Sahibganj.

4. The Controller of Examination @ Examination Controller, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. Sanskrit Education Board, Patna.

… Opposite Parties

Page 1 of 2

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING

----

For the Petitioners :For the State-OPs:

Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, S.C. (L&C) Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate ---- 6/ 18.12.2020Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties through Video Conferencing. The lawyers have no objection with regard to the proceeding, which has been held through Video Conferencing today at 11.00 a.m. They have no complain in respect to the audio and video clarity and quality.

This application has been filed alleging non-compliance of order dated 18.07.2016 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.1611 of 2016.

By filing an affidavit, State submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and a detailed order has been passed, whereby the services of five of the petitioners have been terminated and one of the petitioners has been reinstated in service. The said order is on record. Counsel for the State, thus, submits, that the order passed by this Court has been complied with, though at a belated stage.

Considering the submission of the parties, no contempt is made out as the order passed by this Court has been complied with. However, the -: 2 :- petitioners are at liberty to challenge the order passed by the opposite parties, if they are aggrieved by the said order.

Considering the fact that final order has now been passed, the salary and other benefits of the District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj should be released immediately.

Kumar/Cp-02

(Ananda Sen, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead