Supreme Court of India
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. versus SHAMBHU NATH SINGLA AND ORS. on 22 November 1995
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
A
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. v.
SHAMBHU NATH SINGLA AND ORS.
NOVEMBER 22, 1995
B [K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.]
Service Law:
Discharge from service-Criminal case pending-Reinstatement of C employee on discharge by criminal court-Period of suspension-Salary and other allowances-Entitlement to-Directions issued.
The State of Punjab has preferred the present appeals against the High Court's judgment directing reinstatement of the first respondent pending criminal prosecution. D
Disposing of the appeal, this Court
HELD : Admittedly the first respondent had been discharged by the Criminal Court for want of proper sanction, and he was reinstated in the service in January, 1988. Consequently, he is e.ntitled to full salary and E allowances for the period during which he was kept under suspension.
(583-A]
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: _Civil Appeal No. 11459 of 1995 Etc.
From the Judgment and Ord~r dated 8.8.91 of the Punjab & Haryana p. High Court in C.M. No. 429 (LPA). of 1991.
G.K. Bansal and Sanjay Bans~l for the Appellants.
K.K. Mohan, Pradeep Gupta and Ratan Lal for the Respondents.
G
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
Leave granted.
These appeals by special leave arise from the order dated August 8, 1991 of the Division Bench of the Punjab·_& Haryana High Court directing H the reinstatement of the first respondent pending the criminal prosecution.
-\
STATE v. S.N. SINGLA
Since it is now admitted across the Bar that the first respondent had been A discharged by the Criminal Court for want of proper sanction, he was reinstated in the service in January, 1988. Consequently, he is entitled to full salary and allowances for the period during which he was kept under suspension.
B
The appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs.
G.N.
Appeal disposed of.