Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./7685/2024 of MD AFZAL ANSARI ALIAS GUDDU ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 20 December 2024
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7685 of 2024 ----- Md. Afzal Ansari @ Guddu Ansari @ Afjal Ansari, S/o Hamid Ansari, R/o village-Kurmidih, P.O.-Kalyanpur, P.S.- Barwadda, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand .......... Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. -----
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7685 of 2024
-----
Md. Afzal Ansari @ Guddu Ansari @ Afjal Ansari, S/o Hamid Ansari, R/o village-Kurmidih, P.O.-Kalyanpur, P.S.-Barwadda, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand
.......... Petitioner.
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.
-----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioner : For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P.
Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
-----
Order No.04
Date: 20.12.2024
The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.137 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged. Initially, the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. The petitioner has been implicated in this case on the alleged confessional statement of co-accused-Ravi from whose house four motorcycles including that of the informant and other incriminating articles have been recovered. Except the alleged confessional statement of the aforesaid co-accused, there is no other cogent material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.17 of the present anticipatory bail application. He, however, Arpit/
undertakes to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 3.Learned A.P.P. opposes the petitioner’s prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1[st] Class, Dhanbad in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.137 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
-2-