Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/2190/2017 of A R KRISHNAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 December 2017
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2190/2017 BETWEEN: A R KRISHNAN S/O. LATE RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.476, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, GANESH TEMPLE ROAD, PANCHASHEELANAGAR,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28[TH]DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017.
BEFORE.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2190/201/
BEIWEEN®
A R KRISHNANS/O. LATE RAMANNA,AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.R/AT NO.476, 1ST MAIN,2ND CROSS,GANESH TEMPLE ROAD,PANCHASHEELANAGAR, MUDALAPALYA,BENGALURU-5600/2 APPELLANT|
(BY SRI PRASANNA D P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKABY HANUMANTHANAGAR POLICE BENGALURU,REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT COMPLEX,BENGALURU-560001 ~ RESPONDENT
(BY SRI NASRULLA KHAN, HCGP)-
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 449 OF CR.P.CBY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT|THIS HON BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE|THE ORDER DATED 28.11.7017 AND DISCHARGE THE.
APPELLANT FROM THE SURETY SHIP FOR ACCUSED NO.1.IN S.C.NO.1221/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE,CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU (CCH-71).
THIS|CRIMINALAPPEAL|COMING|ON,FORADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
With the consent of learned counsel appearing)
for the parties, appeal is taken up for final disposal.
2 |This appeal is preferred against the order passed by the learned II Additional City Civil and Sessions.Judge, dated|28.11.7017.InS.C.No.1221/2015wherein the order is passed by forfeiting bail bond of=50,000/- by the appellant surety for securing|presence of accused No.1 in that case.
3. Learned counsel for appellant would submit that|it was at the instance of the appellant the accused was.
secured. Under the circumstances, the surety was ordered to pay an amount of 425,000/- by learned|JMFC and an amount of.V3,000/- that was depositedis already adjusted to the said amount. TJnus, ongoing tnrougn the context of the proceedings dated28.11.2017 it implies that the appellant has to deposit.a sum ot 422,000/-. —
4In the circumstances considering tne grounds.urged by the appellant, the amount payable by way offine on bail Dona of|450,000/- is reduced to.V5,000/-. |The appellant snall remit balance amount of V2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand Only) within 10 days onreceipt of the order. Upon deposit, the appellant snailbe discharged from the surety. |
Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
SBN.
Sd/-
JUDGE