Supreme Court of India
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, UJJAIN & ANR. versus BVG INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. on 28 March 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 899
899
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, UJJAIN & ANR.
v.
BVG INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.
(Civil Appeal No. 3330 of 2018)
MARCH 28, 2018[RANJAN GOGOI, R. BANUMATHI ANDMOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.]
A
B
Judgments/Orders – Typographic mistake – Clarification inJudgment delivered on 27[th] March 2018 and reported in[2018] 6 SCR 861 – Clarification given pursuant to submissionmade by appellant – Para 52 of the said Judgment (operativeportion) accordingly substituted.
C
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3330of 2018.
D
From the Judgment and Order dated 07.04.2016 of the High Courtof Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in W. P. No. 4676 of 2015
WITH
Civil Appeal Nos. 3331 and 3332 of 2018.
E
Devadatt Kamat, Rajesh Inamdar, Aditya Bhat, Gautam Talukdar,Mishra Saurabh, Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mushtaq Ahmad, Advs. forthe appearing parties.
The Order of the Court was passed by
F
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. After pronouncementof the judgment learned counsel for the appellant while mentioning in thecourt drew the attention of the Court to typographic mistake, that whileallowing Civil Appeal Nos. 3330 of 2018 and 3331 of 2018, the dismissalof the Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited is notmentioned in the said judgment, therefore, the same is to be corrected.GOn verification, we find that the said submission is justified.
Hence, Para 52 of the judgment (operative portion) is to besubstituted by the following:
H
900SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2018] 6 S.C.R.
AAccordingly, it is made clear that Civil Appeal Nos. 3330 of 2018and 3331 of 2018 are allowed. Consequently, Civil Appeal No. 3332 of2018 filed by BVG India Limited stands dismissed. There shall be noorder as to costs.
The aforementioned clarification shall be noted by the Registry inBthe main judgment and necessary corrections may be effected in thejudgment.
Ankit Gyan
Appeals disposed of.
C
D
E
F
G
H