WP/62388/2009 of SHRI ANIL S/O NARAYAN RAO GHORPADE Vs SHRI HOLIYAPPA SIDDALINGAPPA BULLA on 10 December 2009

1. SHRI ANIL S/O NARAYAN RAO GHORPADE

AGE :34 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS©

R/O VIKASA NAGAR,

GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI

2. SHRLSANJAY S/O NARAYAN RAO GHORPADE

AGE :30 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, |

R/O VIKASA NAGAR, GOKUL

ROAD, HUBLI

— PRTITIONERS

(By Sr. R. V. ITAGI & R. B. KALE, ADVS)

AND

1. SHRI HOLIY APPA SIIDDALINGAPPA BULLAGE: 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS|AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS|

R/O LAMINGTON ROAD, HUBLI

2. SMT.PARWATEVVA W/O SIDDALINGAPPA BULLAAGE: 75 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURER/O LAMINGTON ROAD, HUBLIAGE: 75 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURER/O LAMINGTON ROAD, HUBLI

3. SHRI.MAITLAPPA MARITAMMAPPA AMARSHETTAGE : 55 YEARS , OCC: AGRICULTURER/O: AMINBHAVI, TQ: HUBLIAGE : 55 YEARS , OCC: AGRICULTURER/O: AMINBHAVI, TQ: HUBLI

4. THER BANK OF MAHARASHTRABY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICK AND MANAGER.KOPPIKAR ROAD, HUBLIBY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICK AND MANAGER.KOPPIKAR ROAD, HUBLI

5. SRILBALAJI AND COMPANY DULY R/B ITS PARTNER|SHRI.T SELVARAJ S/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHU|AGE 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLISHRI.T SELVARAJ S/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHU|AGE 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLI

6. SHRLT.SELVARAJ S/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHUAGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLIAGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLI

7. SHRLT VENGADASALAMS/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHUAGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLIS/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHUAGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLI

8. SHRI.'T ARMUGAM S/O NARAYAN TANAMUTHUAGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLIAGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PINTO ROAD,HUBLI

9. SHRLT CHANDRASHEKARS/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHUS/O NARAYAN TANGAMUTHU

AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: PINTO ROAD,HUBLIHUBLI

~ RESPONDENTS.

This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of.India, praying to quash the orders passed on L.A. No. VIII dated 09/09/2008and imter-alia be pleased to quash all further proceedings of the suitO.S.No.513/2004 conducted after 09/09/2008 and direct the court below tohear IA No.VIII, afresh after taking objections of petitioners to [A No.VIIIand etc..

This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the}following; !ORDER IN WP. NO. 62388/2009 (GMCPC)

“On 6/10/2009 a week’s time has been granted as a last chance to|comply with the Office Objections. Thereafter, on 19/11/2009 a week’s timehas been granted to comply with the office objections. Inspite of that, officeobjections have not been complied with. However, in the interest of justice, aweek’s time is granted to comply with the office objections. If the objectionsare not complied within one week from today, the writ petition standsdismissed automatically without further reference to the court.”

SD/-JUDGE.

Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 2.1.2010 theAdvocates for the Petitioners have not complied with the office objections.Hence, this WP No. 62388/2009 stands dismissed, as per the Court Orderdated: 10/12/2009.

SD/-|

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

T By :-athR- By:-C- By:- -