Gujarat High Court
CRA/1451/1997 of MAHARAJA SAYAJIRAO UNIVERSITY OF BARODA Vs BHUMI DEEPAK VASAIWALA on 8 November 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1451 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1451 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MAHARAJA SAYAJIRAO UNIVERSITY OF BARODAVersus BHUMI DEEPAK VASAIWALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NV ANJARIA for Petitioners No. 1-2 MR BHARAT T RAO for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 08/11/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. On 20th November, 1997, the learned counsel for the respondent made a statement that the respondent had taken up the course of B.B.A. at Ahmedabad and she has given up her right to take admission in the Faculty of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda. In view of this statement, it is obvious that the respondent is no longer interested in prosecuting the suit itself. In the circumstances, there is no question of the petitioners complying with the impugned order. Hence, the impugned order is set aside. Rule made absolute.
��� *******
hki