Karnataka High Court

None 27 of 2009 on 23 July 2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 14[TH] DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

R.F.A CROB NO.27 OF 2009

BETWEEN:

P.J.RANGANATH

S/O P.JANARDHANAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O 2961/55, I FLOOR 6[TH] MAIN, S.V.EXTENSION DAVANAGERE – 577 004

(BY SRI.VISHWANATH R.HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

...CROSS OBJECTOR

AND:

1. K.S.MURAHARI RAO S/O KRISHNOJI RAO SAKRE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS M/S. SHEETAL PLYWOODS JANARDHANA COMPLEX D.NO.80/3, II MAIN ROAD AKKAMAHADEVI ROAD P.J. EXTENSION DAVANAGERE – 02

2. S.G.SIDDARTHA

S/O S.G.SOMASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O H.NO.2229

6[TH] CROSS M.C.C ‘A’ BLOCK DAVANAGERE – 01

3. K.S.DEVARAJ S/O K.SHIVALINGAPPA AGED MAJOR R/O D.NO.1843/41 ANJANEYA LAYOUT DAVANAGERE S/O K.SHIVALINGAPPA AGED MAJOR R/O D.NO.1843/41 ANJANEYA LAYOUT DAVANAGERE

S/O K.SHIVALINGAPPA

4. P.J.SHANKARA RAO

S/O P.JANARDHANAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O H.NO.1926/24 BANK COLONY SHAMANUR ROAD DAVANAGERE

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.HAREESH T.BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R.1; NOTICE TO R.2 TO R.4 IS D/W V/O/D 11.01.2011)

Page 1 of 2

THIS RFA CROB IN RFA NO.2014/2005 IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.07.2005 PASSED BY THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), DAVANAGERE IN O.S.NO.191/1998 IN SO FOR AS IT RELATES TO; A) FINDINGS RECORDED THEREIN HODLING THAT DOCUMENT – EX.P.1 IS AN AGREEMENT TO SELL BUT NOT A DEED OF SECURITY FOR THE LOAN ADVANCED, AND THEREUPON TO UPHOLD THE DEFENCE TAKEN BY CROSS-OBJECTOR IN WRITTEN STATEMENT ABOUT THE NATURE OF TRANSACTION AND ETC.

THIS RFA.CROB COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The Cross-objector is respondent No.1 in the connected RFA No.2014/2005 and he is no more. The LR application is allowed today by this Court after serving notice on the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.1 in the connected appeal.

2. Since the present appellant – cross objector is no more and no application is filed as contemplated under the statute within 90 days from the date of death of cross-objector, therefore, this RFA Crob stands dismissed by operation of law itself as abated.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NBM

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead