Gujarat High Court
AO/312/1998 of SURINDERKAUR JASHBIRSINGH CHHABRA Vs GOPALBHAI PREMJIBHAI GADHIA on 18 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 312 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 312 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- SURINDERKAUR JASHBIRSINGH CHHABRAVersus GOPALBHAI PREMJIBHAI GADHIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MB GANDHI for Appellant MR JB DASTOOR for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 18/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. As a result of the hearing and discussion, the following order is passed by consent.
(A) This appeal is allowed and the impugned order is modified to the extent that the injunction granted by the trial court against defendant no.2
shall stand vacated. It is clarified that the impugned order in so far as the same has granted an injunction against defendant no.1 shall stand.
2. Accordingly, the above appeal stands allowed with no order as to costs.
*******
pirzada/-