RFA/55/2000 of SMTI NAMALA KAKATI ALIAS SAIKI Vs SRI TARANATH SAIKIA and ORS. on 23 December 2000

Conclusion

RFA 55/2000

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U. B. SAHA

It appears from the office note dated 01.08.2006 and as per the Lawazima Court order dated 01.08.1988 that no steps have been taken by the learned Advocate to rectify the defects and not only that as per the report of the Stamp Reporter and the order of the Lawazima Court, the learned Advocate need to file Deficit Court Fee of Rs. 791.10. But no steps have been taken for correcting the defects as stated above.

When the matter is called on, none appears and even there is no prayer for adjournment. In this situation, there is no other alternative being the appeal is defective one; it would be proper for this court to dismiss the matter for non-prosecution.

Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.