Supreme Court of India
ALMITRA H. PATEL AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 6 January 1998
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
~ \
A
ALMITRA H. PATEL AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
JANUARY I 6, 1998
B [J.S. VERMA, CJI., B.N. KIRPAL AND V.l~. KHARE, JJ.)
Environmental Law :
Urban Solid Waste Management-Committee appointed·to give report for Class-I Cities on existing practice for improvement and to review Municipal bye-laws and powers of local bodies and Regional planning authorities and to suggest necessary·_ n1odifications:
c
O~GINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (c) No. 888of1996.
D Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
Aftaf Ahmad, Additional Soliciter General, Joseph Vellapally, N.N. Goswami, Bhimrao N. Naik, R. Mohan, T.C. Ray, A. Raghubir, Nikhil Sakhadande, R.N. Karanjawala, Ms. Manikaranjawala, Ms. Nandini Gore, Y.P. Mahajan, P. E [Parmeswaran, Ms. Anil Katiyar, D.N. Mishra, M.N. Shroff, R.K. Maheshwari, ]S.K. Agnihotri, Ms. Yogmaya Agnihotri, V.G. Pragasam, Anil Shrivastav, Vijay Panjwani, 0. Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Ashok K. Srivastava, H.S. Parihar, Gyanendra Agarwal, Bharat Sangal, K.R. Nagaraja, K.K. Tyagi, H.K. Puri, Bijan Ghosh, K.B. Rohtagi, Aparma Rohtagi, B.S. Chahar, Prem Malhotra, Ashok Mathur, S.K. Mehat, Dhruv Mehta, Fazlin Anam, Ms. Sobha Verma, Ms. A F Subhashini, K.S. Bhati, Bhaumik, K.H. Nobin Singh, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Neithomp Rhetro, S.C. Patel, B.B. singh, Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Ms. Kirti Mishra, Pradeep Mishra, Ms. Niti Dikshit, T. Mahipal, Uijwal Banerjee, Gopal Singh, V. Krishna Murthy, M.A. Chinnasamy, K. Ram, Kumar, Ms. Asha N. Nair, C. Balasubramanian, Y. Subba Rao, Santhi Narayan, Ranjan Mukherjee, R.S. Sodhi, G [Kailash Vasdev, C.K. Sasi, Z. Angami, Mr. D.M. Nargolkar, Sunil Kumar Jain, ]Vijay Hansaria and Jatinder Kumar Bhatia for the appearing parties.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
·•
We have heard learned Additional Solicitor General and Shri Vellapalli, H learned Senior counsel. We consider it appropriate at this stage to constitute °"·
-+
).._
..... . '
r-
a Committee and to specify the specific aspects which the Committee is A required to examine. We direct accordingly.
The Committee for Class -I Cities (having population over one lac) shall consist of the following:- ~ I
222
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[1998) 1 S.C.R.
A authorities shall be bound to implement the same.
The committee is requested to give its report as early as possible preferably not later than 30th June, 1998. The committee is also requested to give such interim reports as it may find convenient so to do.
B
B The secretarial assistance at Delhi will be provided by the Ministry of Urban Development which will also make all other arrangements required by i.Oe committee for its proper functioning \vhile arrangements within the States/ Union Territories would be made by the concerried State/UT. The expenses incurred for the purpose to the same exteot would be borne at this stage by the Ministry of Urban Development and the concerned State Governments/ C UTs. The final responsibility for meeting these expenses would be decided later on.
The local authorities and concerned State Governments/Union Territories shall extend all cooperation and assistance to the committee for its proper D functioning.
List the matter on 20th July, 1998.
R.P.
Petition Still Pending.