Karnataka High Court
WP/116520/2019 of MISS.AYESHA S. PATEL Vs VISVEVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY on 27 December 2019
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD Writ Petition Nos. 116520-116521/2019 (EDN-RES) Between: *Miss Ayesha Mi Ayeha S.Patel, Age 19 years, Occ: Student, R/o.: C/o. Ferzone Pathan, #B-40/2,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
--Writ Petition Nos. 116520116521/2019 (EDNRES)
Between: *Miss Ayesha Mi Ayeha S.Patel, Age 19 years, Occ: Student, R/o.: C/o. Ferzone Pathan, #B-40/2, Heggeri Colony, Hubballi-580 024 Student of III Semester BE (IEM) BMS College of Engineering, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru.
… Petitioner
(By Smt.Sumangala A.Chakalabbi, Advocate)
And:
1. Visvesvarayya Technological University, Jnana Sangama, Belagavi-590 018, Jnana Sangama, Belagavi-590 018, Rep. by its Registrar.
2. BMS College of Engineering, Bull Temple Road, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru-560 019, Rep. by its Principal.
… Respondents
(By Shri Anoop G.Deshpande, Advocate for R1; Shri S.S.Sandur, Advocate for R2) *deleted These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a
* Corrected vide Court order dated 27.12.2019 Sd/- (HTNPJ)
direction in the nature of writ by directing the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to change her branch from Industrial Engineering Management to that of Civil Engineering in the second respondent college.
These petitions coming on for orders, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Page 1 of 2
In these writ petitions, the petitioner is seeking direction to the first respondent to consider her application filed on 04.09.2019 for change of Branch from Industrial Engineering Management to Civil Engineering, vide Annexure-A. Since representation of the petitioner has not been considered, she is before this Court in this writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that if this Court grant some reasonable time, the application of the petitioner vide Annexure-A, dated 04.09.2019 will be considered in accordance with law.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent No.1, the writ petitions are disposed of directing first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure-A, dated 04.09.2019 in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Vnp*
SD/- JUDGE
HTNPJ:
27/12/2019
-W.P.Nos.116520116521/2019
ORDER ON FOR BEING SPOKEN TO
Matter is posted for ‘for being spoken to’.
In the cause title, the name of the petitioner is wrongly shown as “Mi Ayeha S. Patel” instead of “Miss Ayesha S. Patel”.
In the cause title, the name of Sri.S.S.Sandur, learned counsel for respondent No.2 is wrongly shown. The same may be deleted.
Office is directed to carryout necessary correction in the cause title and issue fresh certified copy.
MBS/-
SD/- JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…