Karnataka High Court
WP/62687/2009 of ANANT KALAPPA JARTAKHANI Vs KRISHTAPPA S/O MAHADEVAPPA GADAD SINCE DEAD BY LRS on 10 December 2009
COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD Dated this the 10th day of December 2009 Before THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA WRIT PETITION No.62687 OF 2009(GM-CPC) BETWEEN ANANT KALAPPA JARTAKHANI AGE :79 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER R/ A TORAVI GALLI, HUBLI. ... PETITIONER (By Sri./Smt : G. R.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKACIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD
Dated this the 10[th]day of December 2009
Betore
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.BILLAPPA
WRIT PETITION No.62687 OF 2009(GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
ANANT KALAPPA JARTAKHANIAGE :79 YEARS,OCC: PENSIONER R/A TORAVI GALLI,HUBLI.
_ PRTITIONBR
(By Sri./Smt: G. R. ANDANIMATH, ADV.)
AND
1.KRISHTAPPA ADOPTED 8/O MAHADEVAPPA GADADSINCHK DBECKBASHD BY
l(a) SUSHILABAI W/O KRISHTAPPA GADAD
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEHOLDWORK, R/A GULAM HUSEIN GALLIAND KAMANAKHAN BAZAR, BIJAPUR.
l(b) SRIDHAR KRISHTAPPA GADAD
AGED : 94 YEARS,
OCC : BUSINESS R/A GULAM HUSEIN
GALLI AND KAMANAKHAN BAZAR, BIJAPUR.
l(c) VEERAKUMAR KRISHTAPPA GADAD
AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCC SERVICE, R/A GULAM HUSEIN GALLIAND KAMANAKHAN BAZAR, BIJAPUR, 1(d) RAVIKUMAR KRISHTAPPA GADAD
AGE ABOUT 350 YEARS,
OCC : BUSINESS, R/A GULAM HUSEIN
GALLI AND KAMANAKHAN BAZAR, BIJAPUR.
Page 1 of 2
l(e) PUSHPA GANESH KUMAR
AGE ABOUT 46 YEARS,OCC : HOUSEHOLD, R/A GULAM HUSEINGALLI AND KAMANAKHAN BAZAR, BIJAPUR.
******
.. RESPONDENTS
This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 & 227 oft thConstitution of India, praying to direction quashing the orderdated 30/8/2006 dismissing Miscellaneous Application No.49of 2004 passed by the Pri.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Hubli(Annexure-E); and direct the Prl.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Hubli torestore Miscellaneous Application No.45 of 2006 on his fileand dispose of the case in Accordance with law by recordingevidence, if tendered by the parties and by appointing acommissioner.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Courtdelivered the following;
ORDER
On 06-10-2009, a week’s time has been granted as a lastChance to comply with the office objections. Thereaiter, on19.11.2009 a week’s time has been granted to comply with theoffice objections. Inspite of that, office objections have notbeen complied with. However, in the interest of Justice, aweek's time is granted to comply with the office objections. Iithe objections are not complied within one week from today,the writ petition stands dismissed automatically withoutfurther reterence to the court.
SD/-JUDGE.
READ: The endorsement dated 2/1/2010 made by thePending Branch to the effect that the office objection has not beencomplied with.
As per the Order dated 10/12/2009, the Advocate for thePetitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence,this WP No.62687/09 stands dismissed as on 2/1/2010without reference to the Court, as per the Court Order dated10/12/2009.
BY ORDER
Seal
R- By:-
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR,
C- By:-
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…