Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/843/2022 of RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 28 December 2022
GAHC010271082022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/843/2022 RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA S/O. LT. BISWANATH PRASAD R/O. AZAD ROAD, DOOMDOOMA, P.O. AND P.S. DOOMDOOMA, DIST.TINSUKIA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
GAHC010271082022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/843/2022
RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA S/O. LT. BISWANATH PRASAD R/O. AZAD ROAD, DOOMDOOMA, P.O. AND P.S. DOOMDOOMA, DIST.TINSUKIA, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
Linked Case : AB/3493/2022
RAJIV KUMAR GUPTAS/O. LT. BISWANATH PRASAD R/O. AZAD ROAD DOOMDOOMA P.O. AND P.S. DOOMDOOMA DIST.TINSUKIA ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAMREP. BY PP ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. S ISLAM
Advocate for : PP
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFOREHONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Date : 28.12.2022
ORDER
Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for theState/respondent.
The present application has been filed under Section 363 of Cr.P.C. for extension of time to appear the applicant before theinvestigating officer in connection with an order passed by this Courton 25.11.2022 in AB No. 3493/2022.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the present applicant was asked to appear before the investigating officerwithin 10 days from the date of passing of the order dated 25.11.2022.But the applicant could not appear before the investigating officer asbecause an another case was pending before the ld. Sessions Judge,Tinsukia and he had to attend as such, he was not in a position toappear before the investigating officer within 10 days as per order ofthis Court on 25.11.2022. Therefore, he prays for some more time toappear before the investigating officer as directed by this Court on25.11.2022 in AB No. 3493/2022.
On the other hand, the learned Addl.P.P. has no objection if the prayer of the applicant is allowed.
In view of above, the applicant is directed to appear before theinvestigating officer within 7 days from today in connection with anorder passed by this Court on 25.11.2022 in AB No. 3493/2022.
Interim order, passed on 25.11.2022, stands extended till suchappearance before the investigating officer.
With the above direction, the I/A stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant