Gujarat High Court
SCA/4832/1986 of J.N. JOSHI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 5 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4832 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4832 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- J.N. JOSHIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VH DESAI for Petitioner Mr.Premal Joshi, AGP for MG DOSHIT for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA Date of decision: 05/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr.S.H.Sanghoi, Public Relation Officer, Collector Office remained present personally and through Mr.Premal Joshi for Mr.M.G.Doshit produced communication dated 2.11.1999 wherein it is stated that they do not take any action. The said communication is taken on record.
2. In view of the said communication, dated 2.11.1999, which is taken on record this petition becomes infructuous and hence disposed of. Rule is discharged. No costs.
5.11.1999���(K.M.MEHTA,J)