Karnataka High Court

MFA/9053/2005 of HANUMAPPA Vs BHIMAVVA W/O BHIOMAPPA on 2 November 2007

COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS ON THE 02ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 9053 OF 2005 CPC (SJ) BETWEEN: SRI. HANUMAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA CHANNAPPANAHALLI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL, R/O: ARAKERI, TQ: YELBURGA, DIST:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKABENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS ON THE 02[ND]DAY OF NOVEMBER 2007

BBREBF

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 9053 OF 2005 CPC (SJ)

BEITIWER

SRI. HANUMAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA

CHANNAPPANAHALLI,

AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL,

R/O: ARAKERI, TQ: YELBURGA,DIST: KOPPALDIST: KOPPAL

(By Sri. /Smt: LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI &srt. N.M. HANDRAL, Advs.)

—~. APPELLANT

AND:

1.SMT. BHIMAVVA W/O BHIOMAPPA,AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,R/O ARAKERI, NOW AT ABBIGERI,TQ: RON, DIST: GADAGAGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,R/O ARAKERI, NOW AT ABBIGERI,TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG

2.SMT. ADIVEWWA W/O ERESHAPPAAGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,R/O ABBIGERI, TQ: RON,DIST: GADAGAGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,R/O ABBIGERI, TQ: RON,DIST: GADAG

3.SMT. IRAVVA W/O BASAPPA,AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O ABBIGERI, TQ: RON,DIST -GADAGDIST -GADAG

4.RENUKAWWA D/O BHIMAPPAAGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O ABBIGERI, TQ: RON,DIST -GADAGDIST -GADAG

5.SRI. STIDDAPPA RAICHU

AGE: MAJOR,

OCC: ASSISTANT COMMISSION ER

CUM-LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,KQOPPAKQOPPA

Page 1 of 2

.. RESPONDENTS

(By Sri. /Smt: PRIME LAW ASSOCIATES ADVS., FOR R1-4)

KOK AK OK

This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/O 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC, againstthe Order dated 09.07.2004 passed in Civ.Misc No. 3/2001 on the file of CrvilJudge (Jr.Dn) at Koppal.

This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court passed thefollowing:

ORDER

Needful in a week’s time failing which the appeal stands dismissed SD/-JUDGE

//COPY/

As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 27.04.2010, theAdvocates for the appellant has not complied with the office objections,Hence, this MFA No. 9053/2005 stands dismissed as per the Court Orderdated 02.11.2007

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

R-By:C-By;T-By: ndC-By;T-By: nd

Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead