Karnataka High Court
WP/26065/2022 of M/S. AMT VENTURE TOWNSHIP LLP Vs SRI. G. PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU on 29 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.26065 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S AMT VENTURE TOWNSHIP LLP, REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO.40/1A, 6TH FLOOR, BASAPPA COMPLEX, LAVELLE ROAD,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
-WRIT PETITION NO.26065 OF 2022 (GMCPC)
BETWEEN:
M/S AMT VENTURE TOWNSHIP LLP, REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO.40/1A, 6TH FLOOR, BASAPPA COMPLEX, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 (REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS
PARTNER-SRI A.CHANDRASHEKAR)
(BY SRI.UMESH M.N., AND SRI.A.M.VIJAY, ADVOCATES) SRI.A.M.VIJAY, ADVOCATES)
AND:
...PETITIONER
1. SRI.G.PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU, S/O G.MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO.A-24, LEGACY ARISTONE APARTMENTS, 5TH MAIN, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, ANANTHAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. S/O G.MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO.A-24, LEGACY ARISTONE APARTMENTS, 5TH MAIN, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, ANANTHAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.
2. SRI.MUNISHAMAPPA, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS; S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS;
3. SMT.SAROJAMMA, D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS;
4. SMT.PAVITHRA, D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS; D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS;
5. SMT.APARNA, D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS; D/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS;
6. SRI.VENKATARAYAPPA, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS; S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS;
7. SMT.MAMATHA, D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS; D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS;
8. SMT.SAVITHA, D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS; D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS;
Page 1 of 2
9. KUM.THANUJA, D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS; D/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS;
10. SRI.MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS; S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS;
11. SMT.NARAYANAMMA, D/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS; D/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS; RESPONDENTS 2 TO 10 ARE R/OF DODDASAGARAHALLI VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
12. SRI.NARAYANAPPA, S/O LATE KURESHAMMA @ MALLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHANNARAYAPATNA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 13. SMT.BACHAMMA, D/O KURESHAMMA @ MALLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/OF DODDASAGARAHALLI VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK 14. SMT.HANUMAKKA, D/O KURESHAMMA @ MALLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/OF RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
15. SRI.A.CHANDRA SHEKAR, S/O LATE ASHWATHANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/OF ANNESHWARA VILLAGE, DEVAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT ON IA NOS.3 AND 4 IN O.S.NO.1142/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Office objection regarding maintainability of writ petition is upheld.
2. The captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner assailing the order of the trial Court passed on an application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC. By allowing the application, trial Court has granted injunction which is an appealable order under Order XLIII of CPC. Therefore, writ petition is not maintainable.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial Court and seek appropriate order. Liberty is also reserved to seek advancement. If, such an application is filed, trial Court shall expedite the matter and decide the application after notifying both the counsel.
Sd/- JUDGE
GPG
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…