Karnataka High Court

CRP/101/2008 of SRI JAYAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALI Vs GANESHAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALI on 14 November 2008

COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G. RAMESH CRP No. 101 OF 2008 BETWEEN 1. SRI JAYAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI 2. SRI RAVI S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS 14[TH]DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008

BEBEEO

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G. RAMESHCRP No. 101 OF 2008

BETWEEN

1.SRI JAYAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERIAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

2.SRI RAVI S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERIAGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

(BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA H & MITRA ASSTS,)

— PRTITIONERS

AND

1.GANESHAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS& AGRICULTURIST, R/O RANEBENNURDIST: HAVERI.AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS& AGRICULTURIST, R/O RANEBENNURDIST: HAVERI.

2.SHEKAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERIAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

3.PANDAPPA S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERIAGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

4.PRAKASH S/O RAMAPPA JADAMALIAGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSAGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS

R/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

5.SMT SANGAVVA W/O RAMAPPA JADAMALI

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORKR/O RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI

~ RESPONDENTS

* * * * * *

Page 1 of 2

This Crvil Revision Petition filed U/s 115 of Code of Civil Procedure,praying to set aside the Order dated 26.02.2008 in Misc. Case No. 14/04 passedby the Court of the Crvil Judge (St.Dn) and Pri. JMFC Ranebennur, dismissingthe petition as not maintainable, This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court, Ordered the1.,,.=)/:>

ORDER

Needful in four weeks, failing which the petition stands dismissed, Sd/-JUDGE

JI/COPY/

Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 17.02.2009, theAdvocates for the petitioner has not complied with the office objections,Hence, this CRP No. 101/2008 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated:14.11.2008.

BY THER ORDER OF THE COUR

Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR"

Ty: By. gssR- By:-C- By:-

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead