Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14181/2024 of SRI RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 31 December 2024
2024:KHC:53343 CRL.P No. 14181 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14181 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMI, S/O. SRI. THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
Digitally signed by BKMAHENDRAKUMARLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:53343CRL.P No. 14181 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31[ST] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14181 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMI, S/O. SRI. THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT D MALLIGERE VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 425.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRIKANTH N.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KOPPA POLICE STATION, KOPPA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.438 (FILED U/S.482 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION THEREBY GRANTING PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL U/S.482 OF BNSS ACT 2023 IN CONNECTION WITH IN CRIME NO.61/2024 REGISTERED BY KOPPA POLICE STATION, KOPPA MADDUR ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC MADDUR FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 74, 75, 352, 351(2), 351(3) OF THE BNS 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
This petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, is filed by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 61/2024, registered for offenses punishable under Sections 351(2), 351(3), 352, 74, and 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader (HCGP) for the State.
3. The prosecution alleges that on 18.11.2024, at about 6:00 p.m., while the victim was alone in a paddy field, the accused inappropriately touched her. When the victim called for help, the accused fled from the spot. The victim lodged an FIR on 19.11.2024 at 10:00 a.m. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded, in which she supported the prosecution’s case.
4. It is noted that there are no eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, and the prosecution’s case is primarily based on the victim’s statement.
- 3 -
NC: 2024:KHC:53343CRL.P No. 14181 of 2024
5. The prosecution’s case relies solely on the statement of the victim, with no corroborative evidence or eyewitnesses to the incident. Considering the nature of the allegations, the circumstances of the case, and the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, the petitioner has established a prima facie case for granting anticipatory bail.
6. In the light of the above, the petitioner has established a prima facie case for enlarging him on bail in the event of his arrest. Accordingly, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.61/2024 registered by the Koppa police station, Mandya for the offences punishable underSections 351(2), 351(3), 352, 74 and 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC Court, Maddur, Mandya District, subject to the following conditions:
Page 2 of 3
(i) Petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.61/2024 registered against him by Koppa Police Station for the offences punishable underSections 351(2), 351(3), 352, 74 and 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 by furnishing a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only);
(ii) He shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer for the purpose of investigation;
(iii) He shall not threaten the prosecution witnesses or lure in any manner;
(iv) He shall not leave the territorial limits without prior permission of the Investigating Officer;
(v) He shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly.
Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Trial Court through e-mail.
Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR)JUDGE
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…