Rhett Precedent

Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/856/2001 of PRADIP KUMAR SINGH @ RAJKUMAR Vs STATE OF ASSAM and ORS on 31 December 2001

BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, submits that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. Ms. R. Cho kraborty, learned State counsel is present. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed.

Conclusion

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA

Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, submits that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned State counsel is present.Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacate.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead